Connecting rod differences

Home Forums All Things 750 Twin Your Lonesome and you Connecting rod differences

This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  kaptainkwak 1 week, 2 days ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #25702

    Doctorot
    Participant

    Thought I’d share this observation here for interested parties. The late model connecting rods are a much more refined design, bigger and smoother radii everywhere. It may not seem like much but these details make for a significantly stronger rod.

    #25703

    marksav
    Participant

    They make the earlier ones look very crude ! Almost Russian or Chinese like ? But were they ever a problem area?

    #25704

    beachcomber
    Participant

    Thanx Doc,

    All my engines are now late models.

     

    The Glemseck rods additionally will be magnafluxed, stress relieved and shotpeened.

    #25705

    Doctorot
    Participant

    Not a problem area for a stock engine, but for the brave souls going for bigger power its a small difference that might prevent the rod from creating additional crankcase breathing.

    #25706

    kaptainkwak
    Keymaster

    Very interesting.

    I’m not aware of any issues occurring through this. I also discovered that originally kawasaki did different length conrodsnim a similar manor to the big end bearings to allow for manufacturing errors. You could tell by a coloured dot on the crank. They deemed it unnecessary and stopped it and I must admit i totally agree with that.

    Maybe that was when and why the later style came about?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Share this